Skip to main content

Self-Hosting Jira

This document discusses the considerations surrounding self-hosting Jira, an issue tracking and project management tool developed by Atlassian. It also explores alternatives to self-hosting, including cloud-based options and other self-hosted issue trackers. While self-hosting offers control, the cloud-based Atlassian Jira is by far the most commonly used option. Therefore, this document strongly urges careful consideration of self-hosting alternatives before proceeding.

Atlassian Jira: Cloud vs. Self-Managed (Data Center / Server - Now Discontinued)​

Atlassian offers two main deployment options for Jira:

  • Cloud: Atlassian hosts and manages the Jira instance for you. This offers ease of use, scalability, and automatic updates. This is now the recommended approach.
  • Data Center (Formerly Server): You host and manage the Jira instance on your own infrastructure. Atlassian has ended sales of Server licenses, and support for Server ended in February 2024. Data Center remains an option but is designed for large enterprises requiring high availability.

Important Note on Server: Atlassian no longer sells or supports Jira Server licenses. Existing Server customers have migrated to Cloud or Data Center, or have considered other issue tracking solutions.

Reasons for Considering Self-Hosting (Specifically Data Center)​

While Atlassian strongly pushes for Cloud, some organizations might still consider Data Center for Jira for the following reasons:

  • Data Residency Requirements: Strict regulatory or compliance requirements that mandate data reside within a specific geographic location. While Atlassian Cloud offers some regional data residency options, Data Center provides more granular control. Carefully review Atlassian Cloud's compliance offerings.
  • Security Concerns: Belief that self-hosting allows for greater control over security measures and data protection. However, Atlassian Cloud also offers robust security features and certifications. Evaluate both options thoroughly.
  • Extensive Customizations: Need for deep customizations or integrations that are not easily achievable with Atlassian Cloud. Atlassian Cloud's app marketplace has greatly expanded customization options.
  • Air-Gapped Environments: Requirements to operate Jira in an air-gapped environment (no internet connectivity). Data Center is required here.
  • Integration with Highly Sensitive Internal Systems: The need to more tightly integrate with systems that cannot be exposed outside the internal network.

Challenges of Self-Hosting Jira (Data Center)​

Self-hosting Jira Data Center involves significant challenges:

  • Infrastructure Costs: Requires substantial investment in hardware, software licenses (Atlassian Data Center license), databases, and networking infrastructure.
  • Maintenance Overhead: Responsible for all aspects of Jira administration, including upgrades, backups, monitoring, security patching, and performance tuning. This demands dedicated IT resources and expertise.
  • Scalability Challenges: Scaling Jira to handle growing user bases and data volumes can be complex and require significant effort.
  • Security Responsibilities: Responsible for securing the entire Jira infrastructure, including servers, databases, and network.
  • Expertise Required: Requires specialized knowledge of Jira administration, databases (typically PostgreSQL or Oracle), networking, and operating systems (Linux).
  • Higher Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): When factoring in infrastructure costs, personnel costs, and maintenance efforts, self-hosting Jira Data Center can often be more expensive than Atlassian Cloud.
  • Complexity: Jira is a complex system, and getting it working correctly in a self-hosted manner requires skill.

Alternatives to Self-Hosting Jira​

Before embarking on self-hosting Jira (Data Center), carefully consider these alternatives:

  1. Atlassian Cloud: The recommended option. Offers ease of use, scalability, automatic updates, and robust security features. Explore Atlassian Cloud's compliance offerings to address data residency and security concerns. Consider Premium or Enterprise Cloud tiers for enhanced features and support.

  2. Other Cloud-Based Issue Trackers: Several alternative cloud-based issue trackers exist, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Examples include:

    • GitHub Issues: Integrated into GitHub repositories, suitable for software development projects. Free and simple, but may lack advanced features.
    • GitLab Issues: Similar to GitHub Issues, integrated into GitLab repositories.
    • Azure DevOps: Comprehensive DevOps platform with issue tracking capabilities.
    • Asana: General-purpose project management tool with issue tracking features.
    • Monday.com: Another general-purpose project management tool with customizable workflows.
    • ClickUp: Highly customizable project management platform.

  3. Self-Hosted Issue Trackers (Alternatives to Jira Data Center): If self-hosting is absolutely necessary, consider these alternative issue trackers:

    • Redmine: Open-source project management and issue tracking system written in Ruby.
    • Taiga: Open-source project management tool focused on agile methodologies.
    • Fossil: Distributed version control system with built-in issue tracking and wiki. Simple and lightweight.
    • Gitea: Lightweight open-source code hosting solution.

Steps to Evaluate Alternatives​

Before making a decision, thoroughly evaluate the alternatives by:

  1. Identify Requirements: Clearly define your requirements for an issue tracking system, including features, integrations, scalability, security, and compliance.
  2. Compare Solutions: Create a comparison matrix to evaluate different solutions based on your requirements.
  3. Conduct Proof-of-Concept (POC): Test the most promising solutions with a small group of users to assess their usability and suitability.
  4. Evaluate Costs: Calculate the total cost of ownership (TCO) for each solution, including infrastructure costs, personnel costs, licensing fees, and maintenance efforts.
  5. Consider Long-Term Implications: Think about the long-term implications of your decision, including scalability, maintainability, and vendor support.

When Self-Hosting Jira Data Center Might Be Justified​

Self-Hosting Jira Data Center may be viable if:

  • You have an exceptionally complex compliance requirement that even Atlassian can't meet.
  • You have air-gapped environments.
  • Have the in-house expertise and willingness to manage the complexity that running Jira introduces.
  • Have a significant number of seats (thousands) where the economics may start to favor self hosting.

However, these cases are increasingly rare and should only be considered after a thorough evaluation of alternatives.

Conclusion​

Self-hosting Jira (Data Center) is a complex undertaking that requires significant resources and expertise. Atlassian Cloud offers a more straightforward and often more cost-effective solution for most organizations. Before choosing to self-host, carefully evaluate your requirements, compare alternatives, and consider the long-term implications of your decision. The migration from Server to Cloud or Data Center has forced many organizations to re-evaluate their infrastructure costs. Thorough analysis and consideration of alternatives are crucial before embarking on the path of self-hosting.